Skip to main content

AI Word is Bond

AI bonds are a small part of the debt market. Could they really crowd others out?

Source: iShares AU IHCB

You'll note that many big players in the equity space - Alphabet, Netflix, Apple, etc. - aren't big enough to get labels on the chart.

Furthermore, hundreds of billions in corporate debt pales in comparison to the many trillions in sovereign debt. 

So why is AI related debt considered such a huge threat to public funding

Bonds aren't just differentiated by issuer, but also by maturity. One-year, two-year, up to hundred-year. They're all different beasts.

Debt for data center buildouts plays in the same decades-long space as governments, where there are fewer buyers. A glut of 10-year AI paper may sate the appetite of institutional investors, leaving them with little room for, say, US Government 10 years. 

The resulting price pressure on 10-year debt will definitely impact Social Security, which needs to sell its holdings to keep paying recipients.

So let's add to the list of tech's crimes making it harder to maintain social safety nets

Bad Robot

But why blame AI? What about the others?

Let's say the investment choice is between:

  1. Highly-solvent hyperscalers offering 8% on a technology that is already disrupting work flows and the concept of intelligence itself, or:
  2. Already-indebted Governments offering 4% to helicopter your principal onto welfare recipients in the hope that they will return the "cost of living assistance" favour by not voting in Nazis (or worse Nazis).

I'm choosing the former. Sorry, not sorry.

Capitalism is supposed to welcome competition.

Now that there's actual choice for long-term fixed income, it is upon relatively 'meh' incumbents to lift their game.

Good thing they have options other than sobbing about higher interest costs. They can:

  • Issue at shorter durations. Of course, this means repaying or refinancing within shorter durations.
  • Expand alternatives. In the case of corporates, it could be private equity. For governments, taxes.
  • Deleveraging. Austerity. Streamlining. (Shock, horror.)
  • Ask AI for a five step business plan (LOL). 

In short, they could compete

The market has signalled that there is debt they see as more productive to allocate towards.

AI is too small to break the bond market, but big enough in its niche space such that the market forces adaptation.

That does not sound threatening to me. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Staying For the Kids

Will having children make marriages last? Children, it is supposed, so enrich a marriage that it is more likely to endure over time. They bring a unique stimulus, necessitate close teamwork, and foster intimate communication. While some would argue that they could seek such stimuli elsewhere, and others would say that they can do without that sort of personal development, the naysayers are not strong enough to displace a nuclear family ideal that has persisted despite change in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Australia's Productivity Problem Starts at Home

It’s claimed that Australia’s stagnant productivity is due to a lack of business investment . That's an easy argument: if companies aren’t investing in better technology and equipment, workers can’t become more efficient .  In fact, business investment has paced the overall economy for decades . The real issue isn't lack of investment, but where that investment is going, and what's driving the rest of the economy.

Do Pensions Cause Inflation? πŸ“ˆ

It's not the size, it's the growth. As the world ages, it's worth wondering if retiree benefits will increasingly drive inflation through supporting elderly buying power and enabling them to exit the labour supply. Let's plot pension replacement rates , a measure of pension generosity, against 2023 inflation for the G20, the world's largest economies. In short, countries' circumstances and systems are too diverse for a strong relationship between pension generosity and inflation, but let's break it down further.